<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress Releases 1.5.1 and a preview of possible logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/</link>
	<description>Jefte Puente â€¢ Design Professional living in Melbourne, Florida</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wordpress the button &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wordpress the button!</title>
		<link>http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>wordpress the button &#187; Blog Archive &#187; wordpress the button!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jefte.net/articles/word/#comment-184</guid>
		<description>[...] [2] I&#8217;m well-aware now, after the fact, that people were discussing the &#8216;new&#8217; WordPress logo months ago. However, with the re-design of WP&#8217;s website, the new logo became &#8216;official&#8217;, and this is important with regards to the appropriation of the logo as found object. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [2] I&#8217;m well-aware now, after the fact, that people were discussing the &#8216;new&#8217; WordPress logo months ago. However, with the re-design of WP&#8217;s website, the new logo became &#8216;official&#8217;, and this is important with regards to the appropriation of the logo as found object. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Babylon</title>
		<link>http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>David Babylon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jefte.net/articles/word/#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I think WordPress would benefit from a corporate identity re-design. Blogger has done very well since creating and branding themselves after the Google buyout. I don;t think it can hurt, as long as it is done well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think WordPress would benefit from a corporate identity re-design. Blogger has done very well since creating and branding themselves after the Google buyout. I don;t think it can hurt, as long as it is done well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jalenack</title>
		<link>http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jalenack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 01:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jefte.net/articles/word/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Heh, kinda reminds me of the Volkswagen logo...
Anyways, I like it, but I'm not wild about it. Perhaps the logo part could be blue and the words black?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, kinda reminds me of the Volkswagen logo&#8230;<br />
Anyways, I like it, but I&#8217;m not wild about it. Perhaps the logo part could be blue and the words black?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Praneet Kandula</title>
		<link>http://jefte.net/articles/wordpress-releases-1-5-1-and-logo-previews/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Praneet Kandula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2005 03:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jefte.net/articles/word/#comment-35</guid>
		<description>I personally like this one:
http://jefte.net/images/wp_logo_4.01.gif

But it'd look better if there was an overline as well (underline on top).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally like this one:<br />
<a href="http://jefte.net/images/wp_logo_4.01.gif" rel="nofollow">http://jefte.net/images/wp_logo_4.01.gif</a></p>
<p>But it&#8217;d look better if there was an overline as well (underline on top).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
